The Economic Death Spiral Has Been Triggered
For
nearly 30 years we have had two Global Strategies working in a
symbiotic fashion that has created a virtuous economic growth spiral.
Unfortunately, the economic underpinnings were flawed and as a
consequence, the virtuous cycle has ended. It is now in the process of
reversing and becoming a vicious downward economic spiral.
One of the strategies is the Asian Mercantile Strategy. The other is the US Dollar Reserve Currency Strategy.
These
two strategies have worked in harmony because they fed off each other,
each reinforcing the other. However, today the realities of debt
saturation have brought the virtuous spiral to an end.
One of the
two global strategies enabled the Asian Tigers to emerge and grow to
the extent that they are now the manufacturing and potentially future
economic engine of the world.
The other allowed the US to live
far beyond its means with massive fiscal deficits, chronic trade
imbalances and more recently, current account imbalances. The US during
this period has gone from being the richest country on the face of the
globe to the biggest debtor nation in the world.
First we need to
explore each strategy, how they worked symbiotically, what has changed
and then why the virtuous cycle is now accelerating into a vicious
downward spiral.
ASIAN MERCANTILE STRATEGY
The
Asian Mercantile Strategy started with the emergence of Japan in the
early 1980s, expanded with the Asian Tigers in the 90s and then
strategically dominated with China in the first decade of this century.
Initially,
Japan's products were poor quality and limited to cheap consumer
products. Japan as a nation had neither the raw materials, capital
markets, nor domestic consumption market to compete with the giant size
of the USA.
To compensate for its disadvantages, Japan
strategically targeted its manufacturing resources for the US market.
By doing this, the resource poor island nation took the first step in
becoming an export economy - an economy centered on growth through
exports versus an economy like the US, where an excessive 70% of GDP is
dependent on domestic consumption.
The strategy began to work as
Japan took full advantage of its labor differential that was critical in
the low end consumer product segment, which it initially targeted.
Gradually, as capital availability expanded, Japan broadened its
manufacturing scope, moving into higher levels of consumption products
requiring higher levels of quality and achieving brand recognition.
Success
soon became a problem as the Yen began to strengthen. To combat this
the Japanese implemented the second critical component of what became
the Asian Mercantile Strategy template. It began to manipulate its
currency by aggressively intervening in the forex market to keep the yen
weak.
Further success forced Japan to move to a more aggressive
forex strategy to maintain a currency advantage. It was strategically
decided that Japan's large and growing foreign reserves were to be
re-invested back into the US. By buying US Agency and US Treasury debt
instruments it kept the dollar strong relative to the Yen. The more
successful Japan became, the more critical this strategy became. In the
80s Japan dominated global expansion as it brought US automotive and
consumer electronics' manufacturing to its knees.
By the early
90s the Japanese labor advantage was quickly being lost to the Asian
Tigers because the Yen versus the Asian Tiger currencies was too
strong. The Asian Tigers were following the Japanese model. The Asian
Crisis in 1997 re-enforced to all Asian players the importance of
holding large US dollar denominated reserves. This further accelerated
and reinforced the strategy of purchasing US Treasury and Agency debt.
With
China's acceptance into the World Trade Organization (WTO), China
emerged on the scene in full force. Armed with the lessons of the last
twenty years, China took the Asian Mercantile Strategy to another level
in its ongoing evolution.
The results were one of the largest
and fastest transfers of industrial power ever to occur in history. In
ten years, China assumed the role of the world's undisputed industrial
powerhouse in the world.
The virtuous cycle further accelerated
as Asia became more dominant because its reserves, reinvested back in
the US, began to have a larger and larger impact. The more Asia bought
US Treasury and Agency debt, the lower US interest rates were forced,
allowing Americans to finance more and more consumption. The more Asia
bought US securities, the stronger the US dollar was against Asian
currencies, and therefore the cheaper Asian products were relative to US
manufactured products. It was a self reinforcing Virtuous Cycle.
The
result was a staggering 46,000 factories transferred from the US to
Asia over the same 10 year period. The transfer set the stage for
chronic unemployment and public funding problems, but it was
temporarily hidden by equally massive increases in debt spending.
The
low interest rate driven housing bubble, being of historic proportions,
made Americans feel richer than they were. They took on excess debt in
various forms such as Home Equity Loans (HELOCs) at unprecedented
levels. The acceleration of debt materially impacted both the GDP and
employment of the nation through Real Estate, Construction and Mortgage
Finance job growth further hiding underlying problems.
US DOLLAR RESERVE CURRENCY STRATEGY
Since
President Richard Nixon took the US off the Gold Standard in 1971, the
US has adopted what I refer to as the US Dollar Reserve Strategy. After
the Second World War, at the Bretton Woods Conference, the US dollar
was accepted as the world's reserve currency and as such was pegged to
Gold at a fixed rate of $35/oz. due to massive Vietnam war costs and
President Johnson Great Society, the US could no longer honor its
agreement. In 1971, when France demanded conversion payment in Gold,
the US refused. At this point the US become a fiat currency, not backed
by anything other than the full faith and credit of Washington
politicos.
What were other countries to do in retaliation? What
quickly became evident was there was little they could do. The fact was
that international trade was conducted in US dollars as a matter of
necessity due to the dominance of US export trade; and as such, nations
were forced to have US dollars to transact international trade.
Additionally,
the US established agreements with oil producing Middle East countries
that oil could only be sold in US dollars. Since energy is a dominant
import cost for most nations, this secured the strategic position and
requirement that the US dollar would be maintained as the preeminent
reserve currency by trading nations.
What this strategy meant to
the US was that it could now print money, and effectively export the
potential inflationary consequences of its actions. The 1970s were
initially marked by dramatic increases in US inflation as the strategy
took hold and was implemented. By the time of President Reagan's
presidency, the strategy was working thanks to some herculean efforts by
Chairman Volker at the Federal Reserve. This well executed strategy is
what I refer to as the US Reserve Currency Strategy.
The strategy allowed Regan to implement 'Reaganomics' and his new Supply Side economic policies which launched the longest bull
market in US history. Further enhanced by an extremely loose monetary
policy under Greenspan, relaxed reserve requirements under Clinton, and
tax cuts under George Bush II, the US moved quickly from being the
world's richest country to being the world's largest debtor.
Historic
debt growth was built up without the disease of inflation infecting the
US economy. This is explained by inflation that was effectively
exported whenever increasing levels of US dollars were printed by the US
Treasury.
Any threat to this strategy was rapidly challenged by
US military power. As an example, when Saddam Hussein, President of
Iraq, decided to sell Iraq oil denominated in Euros, he was invaded by
US forces three months later and removed from power. When Libyan leader
Muammar Gaddafi wanted gold in exchange for Libyan oil, he almost
immediately found himself the target of US planned military
intervention.
Presently, oil is still sold only in US dollars,
but more and more trade deals are being negotiated between China and its
trading partners. This is a serious threat to the US and the US Dollar
Reserve Strategy.
THE SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP
One
of the reasons the US Reserve Strategy has worked for as long as it has,
is because there was an incentive by other countries to sterilize the
US dollars they received. This, in the case of Asia, was because of the
Asian Mercantile Strategy they were executing. By sterilizing US
dollars, they held down their currency's exchange rate, which helped
their exports though creating potential domestic inflation. Until
recently, these inflation pressures have been manageable.
In the
case of Europe, the Euro was only coming into existence in the late 90s,
but then quickly moved from well below par to nearly 1.50 to the US
dollar, causing competitive problems for European export trade for many
peripheral countries (PIIGS).
The Asian Export Strategy and the US Reserve Dollar Strategy were symbiotic for a number of reasons:
1.
Though the Asian Export Strategy was an Export Trade Imbalance game
and the US Dollar Reserve Strategy a Volume Trade game, both were
centered on global trade. The US won by increased global trading and the
growing requirement for the US dollars it required - dollars that could
be increased to pay for the military industrial complex without
increasing taxation and used as reserves for global banking growth. Asia
won by getting an ever increasing share of a growing volume of trade.
2.
The US as a 70% consumption economy needed cheap financing to sustain
its insatiable consumption. Asia needed consumption to absorb its
growing exports.
3. The US needed a strong dollar to attract
financing for its debt. Asia saw US debt as a store for its growing
reserves that additionally reduced financing costs for its export
products. In a way Asia was offering a form of vendor financing or 'lay
away' financing.
4. US corporations saw 'off-shoring',
'outsourcing' and 'rightsizing' as major productivity improvements. The
Asian Mercantile Strategy offered American corporations an opportunity
to significantly increase profitability while Asia needed every
increasing and larger market segments to penetrate. US corporations
brought know-how, branding and capital to the Asian economies who
desperately needed these strengths to employ unskilled populations,
increase standards of living and reduce the always present and potential
social unrest.
5. The US economy which had shifted from an
industrial economy to a services economy was quickly becoming a
financial economy with 44% of the stock market being financials. The
financial economy needed increasing capital inflows to sustain itself.
WHAT HAS CHANGED
So what could possible stop this ideal symbiotic relationship from continuing to feed on itself?
A number of factors, all of which are now coming together to end this Virtuous Cycle.
DEBT SATURATION
I recently authored a paper entitled Debt Saturation & Money Illusion ,
that if you have not read, I encourage you to read since it would take
up too much space here. It makes the case that the global economy has
reached the point where annual debt costs are now outstripping the
global economy's ability to support the exponentially increasing burden.
Additionally, stimulus spending by governments has now reached the point where it is actually counterproductive.
The
above chart shows that even using government numbers for inflation
(which are disgracefully inadequate and understated) the real rates in
the old industrialized economies are negative. By contrast, rates in
emerging economies are positive.
This means central banks are
effectively paying banks to take money, yet commercial banks cannot find
sufficient investments to actually absorb the money. Like pushing on a
string, the global economy simply cannot absorb debt at the levels
required to sustain required growth rates which must exceed inflation
rates.
The level of nonperforming bank assets is growing at such
a rate that global banks have serious concerns with their existing
loans and potentially their own solvency.
Growth in Non Performing Bank Loan Levels is shown below. [To see the graphs click on the picture box below]
MALINVESTMENT
I found a recent article entitled: Technology firms struggle to cover interest payments in
the Korean Times to be very instructive. Despite Asian economies
growing rapidly and now dominating the global electronics industry, the
study by the Korean Times found alarmingly that:
a.
One in three firms traded on the Kosdaq stock exchange failed to earn
sufficient money to cover their interest payments in 2010.
b.
280 out of 876 Kosdaq-listed corporations, or 32 percent, could not
reach the benchmark reading of one in the interest coverage ratio. The
interest coverage ratio, otherwise dubbed times interest earned (TIE),
refers to the measure of a firm’s ability to honor its debt payments.
This is classic mal-investment in the truest sense of the Austrian School of Economcis.
Corporations
now have balance sheets so leveraged with debt that their business
models are barely able to cover debt payments even when interest rates
are at historic lows. What does this suggest for possible debt default
and forced unwinding going forward?
Private Equity corporations
with leveraged takeovers and buyouts dominated the US financial
landscape for years. These takeovers left corporate balance sheets
severely damaged and barely able to pay the debt burdens they were
forced to assume.
Additionally, we have learned since the days
of Enron, there are significant amounts of debt held off balance sheets
today in Special Purpose Entities (SPEs). There is no investor
transparency to these obligations. This debt and other forms of
'contingent liability' reporting presently allow corporations to assume
ever larger amounts of debt without impacting their corporate credit
ratings. Everything works fine until growth slows.
Corporations
over the last decade are acting more as highly leveraged hedge funds
with the consequential exposure of margin or collateral calls. This is a
highly risky and unstable situation in the longer term.
CONSUMPTION IMBALANCES
Another
factor causing the unwind is a tapped out US consumer. This has been
forecast for over a decade as an eventuality, but the US consumer
continued to surprise everyone with their willingness to consume and
take on debt. However, since the 2008 financial crisis things have
changed. The US real disposable income has fallen and US consumer debt
loads are now impacting their ability to consume.
Consumption
growth rates in the US have slowed. The Asian economies have
consumption rates below forty percent. The consumption growth rates of
these Asian economies, though growing, are increasing from a much
smaller absolute size. This imbalance is placing further pressures on
the symbiotic relationship.
A VIRTUOUS RISING CYCLE BECOMES A VICIOUS DOWNWARD SPIRAL
Slowly, the cycle is reversing. What was once a virtuous cycle is now a potentially vicious downward spiral.
The death knell for the cycle will be:
1. A deteriorating US dollar,
2. Rising US interest rates,
3. Sustained and chronic US unemployment,
4. Asian inflation, especially in food where 60% of Asian disposable income is spent.
5. Pressures on Asian currency pegs
6. Collapsing values of US Reserve holdings.
BERNANKE'S BOX
I recently published another paper entitled BERNANKE'S QEx BOX!
where I argued what Chairman Ben Bernanke was likely to do at his
critical April 27th FOMC 'Signal' meeting. I was proven right as he
delivered precisely on cue. It was not a difficult call.
The
reason I was so sure is because the real problem was clear. It is about
what the Basel BIS (Bank of International Settlements) Bankers are more
than aware of.
As I point out in Debt Saturation & Money Illusion,
the Shadow Banking liabilities have fallen by $5 Trillion since the
financial crisis, which is a crushing blow to global liquidity and in
fact global financial banking solvency.
An analysis of data by
Fathom Consulting for the US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank,
the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England, showed their assets swelled
from around $4 trillion at the start of 2006 to just short of $9
trillion by the end of February this year. The increase in the size of
G4 central bank balance sheets since mid-07 has ALSO been around $5
trillion to end February 2011, or 8 percent of global GDP.
It is
my view that the Basel BIS Bankers have orchestrated their balance sheet
growth to offset the contracting Shadow Banking System liabilities. For
those that are not aware, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Bank
of England Governor Mervyn King, ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet and
Bank of Japan Governor Masaaki Shirakawa all sit as Board Members and
meet regularly.
FED'S DUAL TRIPLE MANDATE
To do this the
central bankers have increased their balance sheets to their political
limits which can be seen in the following Federal Reserve chart from Zeal.
In
the case of the US Federal Reserve, this has meant such significant
changes that effectively the Fed's dual mandate has now expanded to
three. Besides the official mandates of Full Employment and Price
Stability, a third has been added: Asset Appreciation.
This
is clearly evident when we overlay the above balance sheet growth with
US equity market appreciation, as represented by the S&P 500 in the
chart below.
The top of the red Treasury series (chart above)
represents the total Treasuries, MBSs, and agencies the Fed purchased in
its quantitative-easing campaigns. That red line above is then
transferred to the second chart below as total QE. Superimposed on top
of it is the US stock markets as represented by the SPX (blue). The
strong correlation between the Fed’s monetization and the post-panic
stock-market recovery is remarkable, perhaps even scary.
The Federal Reserve is no longer the "Lender of Last Resort"
The Federal Reserve is now the "Buyer of First Resort"
INHERENT LIMITER: INFLATION
There
can be little doubt, despite Federal Reserve rhetoric, that
Quantitative Easing , ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) and negative real
interest rates have caused a surge in global inflation rates.
Recently
Oil was at a 31 Month high and up 22 percent Year-on-Year. Corn was up
90 percent, Wheat and Soybeans up 45 percent and Rice at yet another
high.
This inflation has been acutely felt throughout Asia which
has to combat this in parallel with trying to keep their currencies
competitive as part of their Asian Mercantile strategy.
Across
Asia, interest rates and bank reserve requirements have been increased,
and in some instance capital control restrictions implemented.
Pressures are such that many, including China, are now at the point of
surrendering sacrosanct currency appreciation.
The problem is
food inflation. Food must be imported and a stronger currency would help
avoid consumer sensitive food inflation, at the expense of assisting
with its own export strategy.
Sixty percent of disposable income in Asia, according to the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in a major report entitled: Global Food & Price Inflation & Developing Asia,
is spent on food. Food is presently expected to average 10 percent
inflation in 2011. This has created tremendous pressures on the
population and potential social unrest for Asian governments.
64
Million people have already been moved into the category of poverty,
which the ADB classifies as below $1.25/day. With 3.5 Billion
consumers, it is expected that 190 Million will be pushed into poverty
if food inflation continues. Food prices were up 30% in February's
report, so the 10 percent Asian food inflation is no doubt seriously too
low.
GLOBAL SLOWDOWN - Q1 GDP SIGNALS
The
efforts to fight inflation are now impacting the 7.8% Asian growth
rate, which is now demonstrating the expected signs of slowing.
US
Gross domestic product was recently reported as rising only 1.8 percent
from January through March, after a 3.1 percent pace in the last three
months of 2010. Taking out inventory builds this number as only 0.8
percent.
Britain reported 0.5 percent growth and is now on the edge of a double dip.
The
Federal Reserve and most economists are all revising 2011 GDP growth
lower, as a steady stream of negative news hits the markets.
If
GDP numbers were adjusted for true inflation, rather than the suspect
government CPI distortions, real GDP would be negative. Considering
government deficit spending is now 20-25 percent of the US economy, can
there be any question that we have effectively very negative economic
growth?
The Basel BIS Bankers are acutely aware of this.
QEX WILL HAPPEN - 'The Risk-Off that Refreshes'
So what is to be done?
I
believe a decision has been taken to temporarily remove some of the
pressures off increasing money supply before resuming expansion of money
and credit later in Q3 or Q4. There is little choice.
Make no
mistake about it however, central bank money printing must continue and
at an accelerated rate. I suspect it will emerge not as QE III, but in
another form to address the massive and growing problems with
non-performing assets, foreclosures and REOs occurring at Fannie,
Freddie and the FHA.
Don't get fooled. Watch the balance sheets of
the central banks. They will by necessity continue to grow to stop the
vicious spiral from accelerating.
CONCLUSIONS
The
Basel BIS Bankers fully understand the underpinnings of the shift from a
Virtuous Cycle to a Vicious Spiral presently underway.
They are
doing everything within their power to offset it. Policies of "extend
and pretend" and "kick the can down the road" are all just attempts at
buying time.
Unfortunately time is working against them, as
existing debt only increases as interest owed is relentlessly and
cumulatively added.
The Basel BIS Bankers have no real answers.
The eventuality of a fiat currency crisis is ordained and has been since
the early warnings in 2007 of the Financial Crisis. The roadmap has
been clear to all that actually wanted to look.
Submitted by Gordon T. Long
| | All truths are easy to understand, once they are discovered;
The point is to discover them. Galileo (1564 - 1642)
| |
''Life's tough, pilgrim, and it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
The information below this line is for Webmasters!
This Webpage Provided by The ANNYBELLE FOUNDATION ExpoZium(with a Z).com © 2011-z
|